Vergelijking van AI-tools
Gamma ships a deck in a minute. HTMLSlides ships one I own. I chose by who sees it.
For client decks I wanted speed. For internal docs I wanted portability. The right pick depended entirely on who opens the file next.
6 min gelezen
Gamma
AI-presentatie en documentgenerator
Gamma maakt presentaties, documenten en webpagina's met AI in een schoon en modern formaat.
HtmlSlides
HtmlSlides is een gratis AI HTML-presentatiemaker voor het maken, afspelen, delen, insluiten en exporteren van interactieve browsergebaseerde diapresentaties. Het helpt studenten, docenten, oprichters, marketeers en teams ideeën snel om te zetten in gepolijste presentaties.
De eerlijke vergelijking
I build two kinds of decks: client pitches that must look polished by noon, and internal docs that get passed around engineering. Forcing one tool across both meant either too much hand-holding or too much lock-in. Splitting by audience fixed it.
Gamma wins when the deck leaves the building. HTMLSlides wins when the deck lives in a repo. The moment I framed the choice around the recipient instead of the feature list, the decision stopped being a debate.
Gamma (gamma.app)
Best for: AI-generated decks, docs, and webpages from a prompt, all in the browser.
Key features: text-to-deck, themes, charts, export to PPT and PDF, a shareable link with view tracking.
Free plan: a free tier with limits on exports and credits.
Pricing: Plus lands around $8 to $10 a month for more exports and features.
Pros: fast, good-looking by default, easy to send a link instead of a file.
Cons: export friction on free tiers, and your deck lives in their system.
HTMLSlides (htmlslides)
Best for: developer-friendly HTML slide decks built from text or markdown.
Key features: HTML output you can host anywhere, code-friendly blocks, full styling control, no vendor format.
Free plan: a free or freemium tier for basic decks.
Pricing: paid tiers add features; the output stays plain HTML either way.
Pros: portable, lives in your repo, no lock-in, great with code samples.
Cons: less hand-holding, and the visual polish is on you.
My verdict: Gamma for anything a client or prospect sees, because speed and polish beat ownership there. HTMLSlides for internal engineering docs, because a deck you can version-control and host yourself beats a pretty link you cannot grep.
Frequently asked questions:
Q: Can I export Gamma to PowerPoint?
A: Yes, on paid tiers. The free tier restricts how often you can pull a real file.
Q: Do HTMLSlides need coding skill?
A: Less than building slides by hand, but comfort with markdown helps. The payoff is owning the output.
Q: Which is better for a one-off pitch?
A: Gamma. You will finish before the meeting starts and the link just works.
Put one of these tools on the leaderboard
Every rank on Best AI Utility is paid and time-stamped — outbid the current holder with one crypto payment and the rank is yours until someone outbids you.
Snelle vergelijking
| Categorie | Productivity | Productivity |
|---|---|---|
| Prijzen | Freemium | Freemium |
| Beste voor | Teams, Makers | Algemene gebruikers |
| Gedeelde tags | Geen grote overlap | |
Waarom kiezen voor Gamma?
- Zeer schone gebruikersinterface
Waarom kiezen voor HtmlSlides?
Laatste afhaalmaaltijd
Gamma past beter als u sterke ondersteuning voor PresentationEnDocs wilt. HtmlSlides kan de betere keuze zijn als uw workflow zich meer op richt. De juiste keuze hangt af van uw budget, gebruiksscenario en gewenste workflow.