scite Told Me a Study Was Contradicted, and I Almost Cited It Anyway

Citations aren't endorsements. scite shows how later work actually used the paper.

I found a study that fit my argument perfectly. scite showed it had been contradicted three times.

The supporting versus contrasting count is the feature. A high contrast count is a red flag.

I now check scite before citing anything outside my field. Gaps in coverage mean unknown, not safe.

It doesn't replace reading the paper, but it tells me which paper to read first.

Citing a contradicted study is worse than citing none. scite keeps me honest.

Más guías

The AI draft is the starting point, not the send button. Here is the three-pass routine that keeps it human.

A research paper I'd been avoiding became a 25-minute walk. The workflow is dumb, and that's why it worked.

Not zero-inbox. A loop that decides what is real so I only touch email twice a day.